Vulnary
← back to the feed
Critical· 10

CVE-2026-64812

A critical flaw in JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA allows attackers to inject input during Remote Development sessions. Because no authentication or user interaction is needed, the vulnerability can give full control over the affected system. The issue exists in all versions before 2026.2.

publishedJul 23, 2026
last modifiedJul 28, 2026
sourcesNVD
severity · cvss
10
critical · how bad it is
exploitation · epss
<1%
29th percentile · chance of exploitation in 30 days
(ai-assisted) A model wrote this summary from the official data, so double-check it against the source before you act on it. Read the official advisory →
auto-deletes from the system
counting…on Sep 6, 2026

No official fix yet. If none appears within 45 days of first tracking, this entry is removed automatically.

01

Who is affected

JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA versions earlier than 2026.2 used for Remote Development.

02

Real-world impact

An attacker could send crafted data into a Remote Development session and run arbitrary commands or install malware, effectively taking over the developer’s machine.

03

Why this severity

The CVSS score of 10 reflects that the flaw requires no authentication, no user interaction, and gives complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

04

What to do about it

no official fix yet

No official fix or mitigation is documented in the sources yet. Monitor the vendor advisory and apply the patch as soon as it is released.

No fix documented in sources

05

Timeline

  1. Jul 23, 2026 · 9d ago
    Published
    Disclosed and added to the National Vulnerability Database.
  2. Jul 28, 2026 · 4d ago
    Advisory updated
    The NVD record was last revised.
06

How it’s attacked

Attack vectorNetwork (remote)
Attack complexityLow
Privileges requiredNone
User interactionNone needed
ScopeChanged
Confidentiality impactHigh
Integrity impactHigh
Availability impactHigh
07

References & advisories

(ai-assisted) A model wrote this summary from the official data, so double-check it against the source before you act on it. Read the official advisory →